Engagement Protocols

Structured approaches to meaningful stakeholder participation in infrastructure events

Protocols for Municipal & Indigenous Engagement

Effective infrastructure events require thoughtful engagement with diverse stakeholders, particularly municipal governments and Indigenous communities. We've developed specialized protocols that ensure meaningful participation, respecting both governance structures and cultural contexts while facilitating productive knowledge exchange.

Municipal Engagement Framework

Our approach to engaging municipal stakeholders recognizes the complex dynamics within local governments and their unique position in infrastructure development and management:

  • Multi-level Engagement: We engage with both elected officials and professional staff, recognizing their different roles and perspectives. This dual approach ensures both policy direction and operational realities inform our events.
  • Size-Appropriate Strategies: Our protocols adapt to the vastly different capacities and challenges of large urban centers, mid-sized municipalities, and small rural communities. We ensure programming addresses the full spectrum of municipal contexts.
  • Cross-Departmental Inclusion: We facilitate participation from various municipal departments involved in infrastructure (public works, finance, planning, procurement, etc.), creating opportunities for internal alignment and integrated approaches.
  • Regional Coordination: Where appropriate, we create frameworks for municipalities to participate as regional clusters, addressing shared infrastructure challenges and opportunities for collaboration.

Our municipal engagement process includes:

  1. Initial outreach through established municipal networks and associations
  2. Preliminary consultations to identify priority topics and desired outcomes
  3. Structured input gathering from multiple departments and governance levels
  4. Clear communication of how municipal input shapes event programming
  5. Targeted invitations ensuring appropriate representation across roles and expertise
  6. Post-event follow-up supporting implementation of insights within municipal contexts

Indigenous Engagement Protocols

Our approach to Indigenous engagement acknowledges the unique status of First Nations, Métis, and Inuit communities as rights-holders rather than merely stakeholders. We recognize the importance of infrastructure in advancing reconciliation and supporting self-determination:

  • Early and Ongoing Engagement: We begin Indigenous consultation during initial concept development, not as an afterthought once programming is substantially defined. This ensures Indigenous perspectives shape fundamental event frameworks.
  • Respect for Governance Structures: We engage through appropriate channels, respecting the distinct governance systems of different Indigenous communities and organizations.
  • Cultural Protocols: Our engagement processes incorporate relevant cultural protocols, creating respectful environments for knowledge sharing and collaboration.
  • Two-Eyed Seeing: We embrace the principle of "two-eyed seeing" (Etuaptmumk), valuing both Indigenous knowledge and Western approaches to infrastructure development and management.
  • Meaningful Roles: We ensure Indigenous participants have substantive roles in our events—as speakers, facilitators, and advisors—not token representation.

Our Indigenous engagement process includes:

  1. Identification of Indigenous communities and organizations with relevant interests or expertise
  2. Early outreach through appropriate channels, with sufficient time for internal consultation
  3. Face-to-face meetings where possible, particularly for initial relationship building
  4. Collaborative development of engagement approaches tailored to each community or organization
  5. Clear articulation of how Indigenous input will influence event design and content
  6. Ongoing relationship maintenance beyond specific events, building lasting partnerships

These engagement protocols ensure our events reflect the full diversity of perspectives in Canadian infrastructure development, creating inclusive spaces for knowledge sharing that respects both governance realities and cultural contexts.

Data Sharing and Confidentiality for Case Studies

Case studies are central to effective infrastructure events, providing concrete examples that illustrate challenges, approaches, and outcomes. However, they often contain sensitive information about municipal operations, financial details, or proprietary technologies. Our data sharing and confidentiality protocols balance the need for substantive learning with appropriate protection of sensitive information.

Case Study Development Framework

Our structured approach to developing and presenting case studies includes:

  • Clear Classification System: We categorize information within case studies using a tiered system:
    • Public Information: Details already in the public domain or explicitly approved for unrestricted sharing
    • Event-Only Information: Details that can be shared with event participants but not externally
    • Attribution-Protected Information: Details that can be shared without identifying the specific organization
    • Confidential Information: Details shared only with explicit permission in specific contexts
  • Collaborative Development: We work directly with case study providers to determine appropriate classification for different elements, ensuring they maintain control over sensitive information.
  • Sanitization Protocols: Where needed, we apply consistent protocols to remove or modify identifying details while preserving essential learning value.
  • Approval Process: All case studies undergo formal review and approval by the providing organization before presentation.

Participant Confidentiality Agreements

To create environments where participants can openly discuss challenges and failures—essential for meaningful learning—we implement tiered confidentiality frameworks:

  • Standard Event Agreement: All participants agree to basic confidentiality expectations, including:
    • Non-attribution of specific comments to individuals without permission
    • Respectful use of examples shared during discussions
    • Appropriate handling of event-only information
  • Enhanced Confidentiality Sessions: For discussions of particularly sensitive topics (failed projects, legal challenges, etc.), we implement additional protocols:
    • Explicit verbal agreements at session start
    • Clear guidelines for what can be shared beyond the session
    • No recording or documentation except by designated note-takers
    • Review process for any outputs before broader sharing
  • Chatham House Rules: Where appropriate, we employ modified Chatham House Rules allowing information use without attribution to individuals or organizations.

Data Management Practices

Our comprehensive data management system protects information shared through our events:

  • Secure Documentation: All case studies and supporting materials are stored in secure systems with appropriate access controls.
  • Permission-Based Sharing: Distribution of case materials follows explicit permission frameworks established with providers.
  • Retention Policies: Clear timelines for retention and eventual archiving or deletion of sensitive materials.
  • Participant Access: Structured systems for event participants to access materials according to established confidentiality tiers.

These protocols create environments where organizations can share meaningful examples—including challenges and failures—without compromising sensitive information. This balance is essential for authentic learning that addresses the real complexities of infrastructure development and management.

Equity & Accessibility Measures in Events

Infrastructure events must be accessible to all relevant stakeholders, regardless of physical abilities, geographical location, or organizational resources. Our equity and accessibility protocols ensure diverse participation that enriches dialogue and strengthens outcomes.

Physical Accessibility

We implement comprehensive measures to ensure our events are accessible to participants with diverse physical abilities:

  • Venue Selection: Rigorous assessment of potential venues against accessibility criteria, including:
    • Barrier-free entrances and navigation paths
    • Accessible washrooms and amenities
    • Appropriate lighting and acoustics
    • Proximity to accessible transportation
  • Room Setups: Thoughtful configuration of event spaces to accommodate mobility devices and ensure clear sightlines for all participants.
  • Materials: Provision of content in multiple formats (digital, large print, etc.) to accommodate different needs.
  • Support Services: Availability of sign language interpretation, captioning, or other assistance when requested.
  • Sensory Considerations: Attention to potential sensory barriers, including designated quiet spaces and scent-free policies.

Geographical Inclusion

Canada's vast geography creates participation challenges for infrastructure stakeholders from remote or northern communities. Our protocols address these barriers through:

  • Regional Rotation: Systematic rotation of event locations to distribute travel burdens equitably over time.
  • Hybrid Formats: Integration of high-quality virtual participation options alongside in-person components, ensuring remote participants can engage meaningfully.
  • Regional Hubs: Where appropriate, creation of satellite locations where participants can gather locally while connecting to the main event.
  • Travel Support: Targeted assistance for participants from remote communities, particularly those with limited organizational resources.
  • Schedule Accommodation: Thoughtful timing that considers different time zones and seasonal travel challenges in northern regions.

Economic Accessibility

We recognize that financial constraints can limit participation, particularly for smaller municipalities and organizations with limited professional development resources:

  • Tiered Pricing: Fee structures that reflect organizational size and resources, ensuring cost doesn't exclude important voices.
  • Scholarship Programs: Dedicated funding to support participation from under-resourced organizations and communities.
  • Value Optimization: Event design that maximizes return on investment for participants, with clear learning outcomes and implementation support.
  • Resource Sharing: Digital access to key content for team members who cannot attend in person, extending the reach of investments.

Inclusive Facilitation

Beyond physical and economic accessibility, we employ facilitation approaches that ensure all voices are heard and valued:

  • Balanced Participation: Structured facilitation techniques that prevent domination by the most vocal or powerful participants.
  • Multiple Contribution Channels: Various ways for participants to share insights, accommodating different communication preferences and styles.
  • Cultural Sensitivity: Facilitation approaches that respect diverse cultural norms around discussion, disagreement, and decision-making.
  • Language Considerations: Where appropriate, provision for participation in both official languages, with translation support.

Through these comprehensive measures, we ensure our events benefit from the full diversity of perspectives in Canada's infrastructure sector, creating more robust solutions that serve all communities.

Back to Methodology Explore Workshop Formats